Stock SPAM – Scholarly Analysis
SPAM has REALLY come of age, at least in a mobid sense! It is now worthy of scholarly analysis. Laura Frieder (Purdue University) and Jonathan Zittrain (Oxford University) have done an analysis of stock Pump & Dump SPAM. My emphasis added. If true, now you know the motive …..$$$$$
Here is their abstract
Abstract:
We assess the impact of spam that touts stocks upon the trading activity of those stocks and sketch how profitable such spamming
might be for spammers and how harmful it is to those who heed advice in stock-touting e-mails. We suggest that the effectiveness of spammed stock touting calls into question prevailing models of securities regulation that rely principally on the proper labeling of information and disclosure of conflicts of interest to protect consumers, and we propose several regulatory and industry
interventions.Based on a large sample of touted stocks listed on the Pink Sheets quotation system, we find that stocks experience a significantly positive return on days prior to heavy touting via spam. Volume of trading responds positively and significantly to heavy touting. For a stock that is touted at some point during our sample period, the probability of it being the most actively traded stock in our sample jumps from 4% on a day when there is no touting activity to 70% on a day when there is touting activity. Returns in the days following touting are significantly negative.The evidence accords with a hypothesis that spammers “buy low and spam high,” purchasing penny stocks with comparatively low liquidity, then touting them – perhaps immediately after an independently occurring upward tick in price, or after having caused the uptick themselves by engaging in preparatory purchasing – in order to increase or maintain trading activity and price enough to unload
their positions at a profit. Selling by the spammer then results in negative returns following touting. Before brokerage fees, the average investor who buys a stock on the day it is most heavily touted and sells it 2 days after the touting ends will lose approximately 5.5%. For the top half of most thoroughly touted stocks, a spammer who buys at the ask price on the day before unleashing touts and sells at the bid price on the day his or her touting is the
heaviest will, on average, earn 5.79%.
powered by performancing firefox
Posted: January 21st, 2007 under General.
Tags: analysis, spam, spammers